The officer only needs to use a reasonable force optionIn evaluating techniques, a final consideration must be made to insure the safety of the officer. Such thinking is both nave and dangerous.
This does not mean that officers must exhaust every lower option before moving to a higher level response. If have the confrontation result in a failure to control the subject, the officer and the general public are put in critical dangerEach technique employed in a confrontation must be evaluated in terms of its likelihood to gain control compared to its likelihood to cause damage. The officer must win and not just 50% of the time.
Restraint after control must be viewed as part of all use of force training10 2.06 Use of Force EvaluationsThe goal of a law enforcement officer in a confrontation is to control the subjectControl is not a 50/50 balance.
Force must cease when control has been effected. Physical performance testĦ1.06 SafetySAFETY IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTRUCTORNo functional firearms or other weapons allowed in the training areaNo jewelryMouth guards are requiredShoes should have good lateral and linear supportOnly ASP batons will be usedThe training area will be kept clearThe Trainer will have a safety setAll activity will stop on the whistleParticipants will only strike areas covered by a training bag or protective training suitBatons will be kept in scabbards on duty belts when not in useħASP Baton Certification (ABC) ProgramSection 2: Control Theory82.01 OverviewThe ability to use force against the public is permitted to law enforcement under the 4th AmendmentAs a result of the responsibility, the use of force comes under close scrutiny by both the public and the courts9 2.02 Confrontational ContinuumIn an attempt to define and clarify appropriate circumstances for the use of force, the Confrontational Continuum was developedThe Continuum provides the law enforcement administrator with a realistic means of evaluating force usage, while providing the street officer with reasonable guidance in determining what level of force is neededThe Continuum was developed in a effort to explain to law enforcement personal the proper response to assailants actions and designed as a mechanism for explaining the level of force that was employed and the circumstances under which it was exercisedSpecific Agencies have diverse labels and techniques for its force options, however the order of escalation and evaluation of techniques used, are generally consistent among agenciesThe physical process of arrest occurs after control has been achieved.
#ASP BATON TRAINING BAG HOW TO#
Maintenanceģ1.04 Course DescriptionASP tactical baton is designed as a defensive impact weaponThe program is simple to learn and easy to understandProvides efficient defensive impact weapon tactics for law enforcement without long hours of trainingProvides techniques that work 90% of the time on 90% of subjects and retains the ability to disengage or escalateWorks effectively for all law enforcement officersThe training incorporates drills which simulates the stress of street encountersProvide you with a basic understanding of the conditions in which the baton may be used, justification for use and how to document these actions41.05 Program StandardsThe ASP Instructor certification program is based on modern, court defensible police standards for less lethal use of forceThe ASP Tactical Baton programs are designed to meet three standards of trainingThe techniques work on the street, not just in the classroomThe techniques are court defensible and are backed by the nations most experienced use of force consultantsThe program is administratively feasible for use in a contemporary law enforcement agency5Basic CertificationStudents must pass a1.
1ASP Baton Certification (ABC) ProgramSection 1: Course Introduction2Course Description8 Hour hands on participatory seminarTrained operational use of the ASP tactical batonFocus on: 1.
0 kommentar(er)
